In a hair-raising mishap that sharply highlights the risk potential of gimmick restaurants, diners in a “restaurant in the sky” in Puerto Rico cheated death when one of the stabilising cables in the suspended deck snapped, violently shaking the platform. The mishap re-ignited the debate about the safety of such restaurants.
The Incident: A Close Call in San Juan
On February 23, 2025, customers of FlyDining, a rooftop dining platform in San Juan, Puerto Rico, were treated to an experience they would never forget. While enjoying a brunch, one of the stabilising cables to keep the platform from swaying failed, and the entire structure violently oscillated and crashed onto the crane arm holding it in place.
- Ignoring the frightening moment, the event management company asserted that there were no structural failures and no safety risks, claiming that all systems were intact. They stated that the malfunctioning cable was meant to prevent swinging and that its failure would not make the entire platform unsafe.
Safety Response and Emergency Steps
Following the accident, the Puerto Rico Fire Department asked FlyDining to close temporarily for a proper investigation. Scott Zuckerman, the restaurant’s owner, wanted to reopen by the weekend, subject to the results of safety inspections.
- FlyDining assured the public that its safety mechanisms operated as designed, avoiding harm. The platform was lowered immediately after the cable failure, and everyone on board, including customers and employees, was evacuated safely.
The Rise of Aerial Dining
The dinner-in-the-air experience, launched by “Dinner in the Sky,” started in Belgium in 2006 and has now grown to more than 60 countries, including Paris, Las Vegas, and Jakarta. The evening usually includes a dining platform capable of accommodating as many as 22 people, including servers and chefs, all attached and lifted into place by a crane. The surprise is merging exquisite cuisine and aerial views, offering customers a memory they will not forget.
- The flying restaurant experience in Puerto Rico has been characterised by a battle between FlyDining and Dinner in the Sky. FlyDining spent $500,000 to establish its footprint in San Juan’s Puerta de Tierra district, and Dinner in the Sky negotiated to offer its experience to the island. The battle has not been controversy-free, with claims of copying concepts and safety approvals.
Regulatory Oversight and Public Perception
The innovation of aerial dining activities has been ahead of the innovation of standardised safety regulations. Even when operators assure strict adherence to safety guidelines, there is an issue with a lack of uniform regulation. Public opinion, being stoked by viral news stories and media outlets, can even determine the acceptability and popularity of such initiatives.
- Following the Puerto Rico incident, the operating firm postponed future events until comprehensive safety tests were completed. They assured the public that they were devoted to safety and implementing further precautions to avoid such incidents in the future.
Psychological Impact on Guests and Public Reaction
The Puerto Rico FlyDining crash was not only physically dangerous but was also intensely psychologically disturbing to those patrons and society at large. Witnesses were said to describe the sudden jerk and impact into the crane as “utterly surreal,” and some of the patrons were reported to have screamed in terror, believing that they would crash to death.
- After the experience, numerous tourists on social media grumbled about their experience. Although the majority assured that they were fine, some hinted not prepared to undergo a similar experience during their lifetime. Psychological trauma, even if without physical injury, has lasting effects. Psychologists believe that near-death experience triggers responses of post-traumatic stress in the shape of anxiety, nightmares, and phobias, height and closed-in spaces, particularly.
- Apart from that, the event also created a ripple of fear and uncertainty among prospective consumers globally. Most other similar dining establishments worldwide fell sharply in bookings during the weeks shortly after the accident. Restaurant review websites and travel forums showed a developing concern among consumers about the safety elements and backup planning in danger-prone dining structures.
Central kitchen area, for the chefs and waiters

Stability cables, to limit rotational motion or swaying to a minimum
Emergency lowering systems, to lower the platform safely to the ground in the event of failure
In the FlyDining accident, the stabilising cableโa critical part designed to resist horizontal movement from wind or motion. While this cable is not loaded with weight, its failure resulted in uncontrollable swinging, which is deemed highly hazardous in windy or coastal environments such as Puerto Rico’s coastal regions.
- Investigative officials are now trying to determine if metal fatigue, incorrect installation, or inattention caused the cable’s failure. They are also investigating records for the training of crane operators and event personnel to determine if operator error was a causal factor behind the unsafe condition.
Industry Practices: Are They Safe?
Worldwide, air dining is promoted as extremely safe. Most suppliers state that they surpass the national safety standards and perform maintenance before each lift. The European DIN 4112 standard, commonly utilised as the reference point, regulates the lifting of human beings by cranes and demands:
Pre-operation checks daily
Still, in some jurisdictions, flying restaurants remain in a legal twilight zoneโneither amusement rides, which are regulated, nor typical food service, which is not. This loophole in the regulatory scheme can contribute to enforcement chaos. In Puerto Rico, officials conceded that the regulatory system might not have kept up with the surge of experiential dining start-ups.
- This accident can now be a wake-up call for the whole industry. Public safety and engineering experts demand global regulations to ensure annual certification, clear safety disclosure, and third-party audit of all aerial hospitality operators.